It was 1963, and 16-year-old Bruce McAllister was sick of symbol-hunting in English class. Rather than quarrel with his teacher, he went straight to the source: McAllister mailed a crude, four-question survey to 150 novelists, asking if they intentionally planted symbolism in their work. Seventy-five authors responded. Here’s what they had to say.
IT DOESN’T MATTER IF THE AUTHOR PUT IT THERE INTENTIONALLY OR NOT. That is not the point. Reading is not a game of Clue; books are not a mystery that you have to solve by putting all the pieces together. That’s not the point. Find the meaning you want to find in it. That’s what we do with books because that’s what we do in life.
What Margaret said. If the point of reading is merely to understand precisely what the author intended, then reading is just this miserable one-sided conversation in which an author is droning on to you page after page after page and the reader just sits there receiving a monologue.
That’s not reading. That’s listening.
Reading is the active co-creation of a story, complete with all its symbols and abstractions.
To read well, you have to understand that sometimes an oligarchic pig is not just an oligarchic pig. Maybe Orwell intended Animal Farm to be about how dangerous pigs can be. Maybe he had a personal vendetta against pigs. It doesn’t matter. It happens to say a lot about how humans organize themselves, and how power and social status shape our understanding of justice. It happens to capture the limits of human empathy, and how those limitations can lead to structural inequality.
I don’t see how it matters at all whether Orwell intended his book to be as good as it turned out to be. So when the story above says that a 16-year-old went “straight to the source,” the article is dead wrong, because every story has two sources: writer and reader.
scientificunrealism reblogged this from pepckoala
pepckoala reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
fueled-bypizza likes this
atpen likes this
travelthroughtheuniverse likes this
lovers-and-clowns likes this
veela-valoom reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
hanahabbyshii reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
chrysanthedads reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
butwewereokay reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
inky-sea reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
mysocksthinkitstuesday reblogged this from crown-of-weeds
mundaneepiphanies likes this
emeldirakafinduilas likes this
realityhasleftme likes this
kink4life reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
kink4life likes this
whoaacristina likes this
chocolateonmyshoe reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
chocolateonmyshoe likes this
eucatastrophia reblogged this from rajkumaris
poppisima likes this
youbreathedintome likes this
jjenah reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
glimmerbulb reblogged this from tenbeefsteaks and added:
Man, screw authorial intent. Historical and cultural context is way more important
tenbeefsteaks reblogged this from wilwheaton
favouritethoughts reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
kisforaaron reblogged this from mentalflossr
flameohotwoman reblogged this from wilwheaton
noonebutabloghead reblogged this from lamaison
shareallthefeels reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
lamaison reblogged this from gallifreyfieldsforever
dysontree reblogged this from sanduval
sanduval reblogged this from wilwheaton and added:
Thank you. I absolutely agree. I also agree that Brave New and All Quiet were great. Loved All Quiet.
castledust reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
hand-and-pen reblogged this from petaldancing
tastethehappymichael reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
thebwordisabadword likes this
nothingtwixtyouandtheticking likes this
foreignordomestic reblogged this from sunscraps
lightasaghost likes this
sunscraps reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
filmfixed likes this
floerian reblogged this from fishingboatproceeds
badwolfday reblogged this from welcometodelphi
dorjan reblogged this from thelastpapertiger
herculeanjet likes this
criterionbar likes this
empath-eia likes this
